HT: Don Boudreaux
Pingback: Top Posts « WordPress.com
Pingback: Josue’s Blog 2.0 » Funny for the day: The Everyday Economist
What’s not right is this:-
- People did usually live a lot longer (the caption is wrong).
- Even so life expectancy was less than ours. However, it was broken up very differently. Young men died from wider spread violence, tribal wars and such. Children and the elderly sometimes died from diseases like pneumonia, but only in bad times when the food supply ran short.
Result: only lower total populations were possible, but people who made it through their teens (most of them) often lived as long as we do. Life expectancies were around fifty or sixty at birth, not thirty.
Have a look at how the Aleuts coped, providing low effort support systems for their elderly and how they knew that the “strongman” training shortened life.
The real suffering comes to oppressed peasants, not to subsistence farmers and/or hunter-gatherers.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 80 other followers