Gold and Inflation, Again

Question: When the relative price of gold increases in the short run, is this a sign of inflation or deflation/disinflation?

This is somewhat of a trick question because either answer is possible. (Doesn’t Scott Sumner always say, “don’t reason from a price change”?) The price of gold in and of itself tells us very little. One must look at other economic indicators to make any sort of prediction.

A number of individuals have claimed that the recent rise in the price of gold is a sign of a coming inflation. However, this doesn’t square with the numbers or the gold market. Over the longer term, gold prices have been rising due to the factors of supply and demand. Over the shorter term, the current increase in the price of gold is consistent with deflationary/disinflationary headwinds — as economic theory predicts.

In the last five years, the price of gold has risen by nearly 200%. Yet, if we look at the price level (as measured by the PCE price index), we see that it has risen only 12% over the past five years.

So what can explain the run-up in gold prices? I talked about this back in December 2009 and the analysis holds true today:

Let’s examine the characteristics of the gold market. Gold has three uses on the demand side: (1) an investment hedge against inflation, (2) jewelry, and (3) industrial uses. On the supply side, there is an existing (stock) supply and a flow supply generated by mining. Changes in the stock supply of gold are most often the result of central bank behavior.

To argue that the increase in the price of gold is the result of monetary policy, one would have to be able to show that policy is loose and that the increase in the price of gold is being driven by investment demand. Readers know that I don’t think that monetary policy is too loose. I will not rehash that argument. However, let’s examine the gold market.

Over the last 5 years or so, we have seen the following changes:

  • Central banks have reduced the amount of gold that they are selling.
  • Gold ETFs have increased the demand by purchasing gold for storage.
  • Gold mining output peaked somewhere around 2001.

Supply declines. Demand increases. Price increases.

When you factor in the substantial increase in demand from India and China, this provides further evidence of a secular increase.

Of course, critics might argue that inflation expectations are accelerating the increase in the price of gold above that secular trend. For example, gold prices have risen 14% this month and 30% in the last six months. Such short term fluctuations could not be caused by the secular factors listed above. So doesn’t this mean that the recent run-up in gold prices is due to higher inflation/inflation expectations? No.

Under a gold standard, a relative increase in the price of gold is deflationary (by definition, since the gold price is fixed). An increase in the stock demand for gold causes a corresponding decrease in the demand for consumption goods and the relative price of gold increases (the relative price of consumption goods falls). Although the world is clearly no longer on a gold standard, a number of individuals as well as central banks are purchasing gold as a safe haven and therefore reducing spending or productive saving (i.e. saving that can be used toward investment).

Moreover, other liquid assets provide similar signals. The yield on the 5-year Treasury has fallen 38 basis points since August 1. The yield on the 10-year Treasury has fallen 67 basis points in the same time frame. This is contrary to what one would predict to coincide with higher inflation expectations, but consistent with the view that rising prices on Treasuries and the rise in the price of gold reflect a flight to liquidity and not increasing inflation expectations.

6 responses to “Gold and Inflation, Again

  1. Finally, a rational explanation. A few of my Austrian/ anarchist friends are buying gold and silver banking (no pun intended) on stagflation caused by the Fed monetizing the debt. Now they actually want inflation to be high since they own gold and silver. Is is ironic for an anarchist to want gold to have a high value relative to a fiat currency they don’t want to exist? Doesn’t it matter more whether gold has a high purchasing value relative to other commodities, goods, and services?

  2. Excellent post. It struck me the other day that if we were still on Bretton-Woods, we would have 1/55th the money supply. Would that not be hugely deflationary? Or should I stick to music?

  3. If I understand your deflationary thesis correctly – It is relative to the value of gold. Unless we are returning to a gold standard, inflation/deflation are measured relative to the value of money.

  4. Bryan; A proper austrian (or even just Smithian) understanding of money grasps that there is nothing sacred about gold. All currencies are fiat. There is no fundamental intrinsic value, the price of anything is the point where a buyer and seller come to an agreement – that includes gold, as well as paper money. The principle “Austrian” or “Anarchist” impetus for a gold standard is the elimination of control of money supply by central banks – as these externally manipulate the entire pricing system.

  5. Pingback: Question: When the relative price of gold increases in the short run, is this a sign of inflation or deflation/disinflation? « Economics Info

  6. Pingback: Monetary Policy and Politics | The Everyday Economist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s